What kind of scene would you like? The answer to this question is difficult in real-world processing environments, and most shops fall somewhere between the extremes.
Add value to
Consider the three performance values of the cutter to determine the processing cost and determine the appropriate processing solution:
- The time required for the work cutting tool to get the parts through the machine.
- Tool life, according to the number of knives or the number of parts of the tool.
- Cost of project tool use.
As you can see, the cutting tools in the actual cost is just the equation of one of three factors, so if this is the only value into consideration, so the shop ignores the other two important factors. In order to maximize productivity, a store needs to remove the parts from the machine as quickly as possible, using the best tool life to reduce the cost of the tool.
Comparing these key factors in the actual application requires some basic mathematical knowledge (see figure below). For example, the cost of each part of the tool plus the price of the workshop divided by the number of parts per hour. The cost of cutting tools for each part is usually a small fraction of the total cost of production. Although using a much less expensive tool initially looks attractive, it can reduce some of the costs, but usually cost savings are only a small fraction of the total cost. For most stores, the greater cost savings come from getting parts from machines faster.
By using circular socket, because of the strength of the circular cutting edge and the fact that the cutting “thins” when cutting edge of cutting edge, the application of the button cutter can be actively processed.
