Therefore, any metal cutting operation should be performed in a completely closed (shielded) environment to prevent damage from flying objects. After purchase, DPA does not bear any loss, damage or expense of any use or disposal of our products.

Grinding produces harmful dust. To avoid adverse health effects, use appropriate ventilation and reading material safety data sheets first.

Calculation of hole diameter

Large diameter hole diameter calculation screw interpolation

When the screw interpolation technique is used, the production of large diameter hole can be quickly and easily. This technique is similar to the movement of threads in all three axes (X, Y, and Z). Unlike thread milling, it is introduced without any kind of starting hole. The tool simply locates in the inner diameter of the hole, and from there it begins its spiral by reaching down to the final depth to achieve complete removal of the material. This kind of smooth operation avoids the high – horsepower consumption characteristic of large diameter hole. This quick and simple process provides an additional advantage that allows many different hole sizes to be generated using the same diameter tool. The hole size changes are in programming.

suggest

• square shoulder milling allows for heavy cutting depth (DHOC), but DPA recommends no more than 2/3 in insert length to reduce the chance of screw breakage.
• use the cutting edge of the blade as much as possible to get the most metal cutting in the life of the insert tool.
• use a larger angular radius and be the sharpest in rough applications.

When possible, suggest that you climb the mill.

• square shoulder tools can’t dive; Instead, use 1/2 to 2 ° slope Angle for large diameter. Larger slope angles may be cut with partial width.
• 

There is a sharper edge (Angle) on the shoulder tool, and excessive vibration creates the potential for whittling, which can lead to catastrophic failure. The button cutter provides good metal removal on less rigid machines for two main reasons. First, the rounded blade is stronger than the sharp square shoulder blade. This greater intensity allows the insertion to better absorb vibrations and vibrations during the cutting process, as well as some interrupt cutting. Second, the rounded blades produce variable tool pressure, which means that the force between axial and radial (up and down) is much larger. This fragmentation of tooling forces forces most of the tool pressure back to the workpiece, helping to reduce the need for the machine’s main axis and mode. With a button cutter, you can lower the feed rate on machines that were previously unskilled, but a lighter cut depth (usually less than 0.60 inches or 1.5mm) is necessary.

The stiffness of the workpiece is a completely different problem. Here, the focus tool of the square shoulder cutting tool is often an advantage. For example, a working widget is poorly supported under the widget. In this case, any cutting pressure generated in the direction of the axial (lower) direction causes vibration, because the pressure lacks a stable base, and the shoulder tool may be more suitable for milling.

In this case, you can see the insert fracture of the button tool before breaking the bottom. Square shoulder blades are best suited for such applications because the pressure will go directly to the side walls of the parts, not the processed floor.

The wg-6300 is the only commercially available second-generation coated ceramic composite cutter, which is reinforced by whiskers. Good at finishing high strength alloy material. Using 4140 and 4150 alloy steel hard to 42Rc, ceramic and carbide blades, green leaf turning and boring tools will meet your special needs.

Carbide

 

In these cases, the metal removal rate is far greater than the capacity of most of the shoulder tools, but the power consumption will increase proportionally.

However, in most cases, when the horsepower is sufficient, the shoulder tool is better than a button cutter. This observation comes from the fact that a square shoulder insertion usually has a cutting edge length of 15-17 mm, which maintains a uniform thickness of the chip in the cross-section of the chip. A key cutter will allow deep cutting, but because of its circular shape, the increase of cutting depth will increase the chip thickness. This phenomenon results in very high cutting force and tool pressure, creating the possibility of premature insertion of wear, insert fragments or workpiece movements.

This creates an acceptable metal removal rate, even for a light machine. However, the shoulder tool will be limited to any depth that the machine allows, limiting the removal of the metal.

Rigidity is a factor in machine tool and workpiece installation. A box-type machine tool will allow more cuts than linear methods. A workpiece is set up and solid, and a good distributed clamping will allow more tool pressure than an unsupported section (for example, if part is wider than vise). These problems are related to tool selection.

In terms of mechanical stiffness, a good rule of thumb is that in the rigid machine, square shoulder tool will flourish, and a button will be in a less rigid tool machine is more satisfactory. The main reason for this phenomenon is the tool geometry. The flat shoulder tool, which has a 90-point front edge, will generate mainly radial cutting force and provide depth of potential recutting. Heavy cutting requires good machine spindle and mode rigidity, or vibration is almost certain to occur.

There is a sharper edge (Angle) on the shoulder tool,

The wrong answer may result in spending extra time in the rough process, resulting in loss of revenue at work, and, worse, a backup of tasks on the same machine. In addition, using the wrong tool to coarsen causes a headache for the final operation, and it takes an extra time to balance the remaining inventory before finishing the processing accurately.

Rough tools in a variety of shapes and designs, but for the sake of simplicity, this article will discuss the square shoulder end of the indexable milling cutter and buttons (copy), which is the most common and most effective market, gm’s rough tools.

The side – side milling cutter usually has a parallelogram insertion, with two cutting edges. This type of tool creates a 90-wall, similar to a solid-square end milling cutter. Most of the end milling cutter provides the choice of multi-angle radii, making them a common tool for many rough machining, as well as the finished application. A button cut, sometimes referred to as a copy factory, has rounded inserts that provide 4-8 cutting edges. This tool forms a large radius at the bottom of the incision, which is beneficial to the processing circle or Angle shape. Button cutters also have a variety of styles, with axial rakes, insert clips and insert size changes.

So, how to choose? Let’s look at the various factors involved in the process and the pros and cons of each tool design.

The shoulder tool can cut the depth of the cutting depth, so it is easier to consume the available horsepower than the button factory. The exception here is the extremely high feed rate, some of which are capable, and the square mill is not. In some cases, according to the inserted I.C. (PI), the button mill can run each tooth over 0.050 inches (1.27 millimeters) of feed, with a depth of about 0.050 (or more).

There is a sharper edge (Angle) on the shoulder tool, and excessive vibration creates the potential for whittling, which can lead to catastrophic failure. The button cutter provides good metal removal on less rigid machines for two main reasons. First, the rounded blade is stronger than the sharp square shoulder blade. This greater intensity allows the insertion to better absorb vibrations and vibrations during the cutting process, as well as some interrupt cutting. Second, the rounded blades produce variable tool pressure, which means that the force between axial and radial (up and down) is much larger. This fragmentation of tooling forces forces most of the tool pressure back to the workpiece, helping to reduce the need for the machine’s main axis and mode. With a button cutter, you can lower the feed rate on machines that were previously unskilled, but a lighter cut depth (usually less than 0.60 inches or 1.5mm) is necessary.

The stiffness of the workpiece is a completely different problem. Here, the focus tool of the square shoulder cutting tool is often an advantage. For example, a working widget is poorly supported under the widget. In this case, any cutting pressure generated in the direction of the axial (lower) direction causes vibration, because the pressure lacks a stable base, and the shoulder tool may be more suitable for milling. In this case, a button cutter will more easily produce the vibration of the workpiece, resulting in lower surface finish, reduced tool life and higher noise level.

This phenomenon is most obvious in machining. When the cutter is near the bottom, a button cutter produces a noticeable floor vibration that damages the remaining material in the pocket. In this case, you can see the insert fracture of the button tool before breaking the bottom. Square shoulder blades are best suited for such applications because the pressure will go directly to the side walls of the parts, not the processed floor.

 

However, in most cases, when the horsepower is sufficient, the shoulder tool is better than a button cutter. This observation comes from the fact that a square shoulder insertion usually has a cutting edge length of 15-17 mm, which maintains a uniform thickness of the chip in the cross-section of the chip. A key cutter will allow deep cutting, but because of its circular shape, the increase of cutting depth will increase the chip thickness. This phenomenon results in very high cutting force and tool pressure, creating the possibility of premature insertion of wear, insert fragments or workpiece movements.

In more limited cases, such as in many newer high speed machining centers, button cutters have an advantage because of the high feed rate mentioned earlier. In this case, the button cutter can operate at a lower cut depth, and each tooth has a large amount of feed. This creates an acceptable metal removal rate, even for a light machine. However, the shoulder tool will be limited to any depth that the machine allows, limiting the removal of the metal.

Rigidity is a factor in machine tool and workpiece installation. A box-type machine tool will allow more cuts than linear methods. A workpiece is set up and solid, and a good distributed clamping will allow more tool pressure than an unsupported section (for example, if part is wider than vise). These problems are related to tool selection.

In terms of mechanical stiffness, a good rule of thumb is that in the rigid machine, square shoulder tool will flourish, and a button will be in a less rigid tool machine is more satisfactory. The main reason for this phenomenon is the tool geometry. The flat shoulder tool, which has a 90-point front edge, will generate mainly radial cutting force and provide depth of potential recutting. Heavy cutting requires good machine spindle and mode rigidity, or vibration is almost certain to occur.

The wrong answer may result in spending extra time in the rough process, resulting in loss of revenue at work, and, worse, a backup of tasks on the same machine. In addition, using the wrong tool to coarsen causes a headache for the final operation, and it takes an extra time to balance the remaining inventory before finishing the processing accurately.

Rough tools in a variety of shapes and designs, but for the sake of simplicity, this article will discuss the square shoulder end of the indexable milling cutter and buttons (copy), which is the most common and most effective market, gm’s rough tools.

The side – side milling cutter usually has a parallelogram insertion, with two cutting edges. This type of tool creates a 90-wall, similar to a solid-square end milling cutter. Most of the end milling cutter provides the choice of multi-angle radii, making them a common tool for many rough machining, as well as the finished application. A button cut, sometimes referred to as a copy factory, has rounded inserts that provide 4-8 cutting edges. This tool forms a large radius at the bottom of the incision, which is beneficial to the processing circle or Angle shape. Button cutters also have a variety of styles, with axial rakes, insert clips and insert size changes.

So, how to choose? Let’s look at the various factors involved in the process and the pros and cons of each tool design.

The shoulder tool can cut the depth of the cutting depth, so it is easier to consume the available horsepower than the button factory. The exception here is the extremely high feed rate, some of which are capable, and the square mill is not. In some cases, according to the inserted I.C. (PI), the button mill can run each tooth over 0.050 inches (1.27 millimeters) of feed, with a depth of about 0.050 (or more). In these cases, the metal removal rate is far greater than the capacity of most of the shoulder tools, but the power consumption will increase proportionally.

Applications that need a lot of metal removal can be through the use of an aggressive cutting depth and a medium feed to successfully processed, or using a light cutting depth and super aggressive feed. Both achieve high metal removal rates, but also provide different types of machine tools.

Older, more powerful machines can respond well to a button that runs under heavy, deep cuts, usually allowing only moderate feed. Update, portable machine is built for speed, allow the button tool in high speed machining “mode, to provide good metal removal rate and low cutting depth and feed rate very fast.

The cutting force can also be controlled with a button cutter. When working at a heavy cutting depth, a button cutter will produce a more radial cutting force (horizontal direction from the tool’s contact direction). However, by reducing the cutting depth – such as high speed or high feed processing – the cutting force is more axial (up to the spindle), allowing stronger metal cutting and longer tools.

DPA’s rhine-carb insertion line provides an outstanding value for the performance of button cutting tools. Our new RPMH button insertion is characterized by thicker carbon, providing better intensity and thermal absorption. The cutting edge of the technical pressure provides a positive geometric shape for low force cutting and has the ability to handle the maximum feeding speed. There are three different geometric shapes to choose from. DPA’s rhine-carb “T” insertion is the most robust, providing the strongest advantage for an attack or high-shock application. “N” cutting edges allow aggressive feed, but with higher positive edges to create less pressure and heat than “T”. The DPA’s most important cutting edge is “D”, which provides the ultimate high shear cut for low cutting force, low heat and optimum performance of stainless steel and high temperature alloys.

This is just one example of the daily challenges of most mechanical stores – how best to rough it before half-finished or finished machining.

What kind of scene would you like? The answer to this question is difficult in real-world processing environments, and most shops fall somewhere between the extremes.

Add value to

Consider the three performance values of the cutter to determine the processing cost and determine the appropriate processing solution:

1. The time required for the work cutting tool to get the parts through the machine.
2. Tool life, according to the number of knives or the number of parts of the tool.
3. Cost of project tool use.

As you can see, the cutting tools in the actual cost is just the equation of one of three factors, so if this is the only value into consideration, so the shop ignores the other two important factors. In order to maximize productivity, a store needs to remove the parts from the machine as quickly as possible, using the best tool life to reduce the cost of the tool.

Comparing these key factors in the actual application requires some basic mathematical knowledge (see figure below). For example, the cost of each part of the tool plus the price of the workshop divided by the number of parts per hour. The cost of cutting tools for each part is usually a small fraction of the total cost of production. Although using a much less expensive tool initially looks attractive, it can reduce some of the costs, but usually cost savings are only a small fraction of the total cost. For most stores, the greater cost savings come from getting parts from machines faster.

By using circular socket, because of the strength of the circular cutting edge and the fact that the cutting “thins” when cutting edge of cutting edge, the application of the button cutter can be actively processed.

In a program designed to benefit mill operators with varying skill levels, two days of intensive courses have been reduced to as many as 14, allowing one-to-one support. “We’re not just talking about two days of milling technology and formula,” says Mr Bitner. “We conducted a practical demonstration on machine tools, to create a team, responsible for the application to select a grade and geometry, and then calculate the appropriate speed and everyone’s feedback.” Before we demonstrate the application, we will discuss the discovery of each team, allowing everyone to participate and make security mistakes. He added that the company received positive feedback from the hands-on approach. The tool selection and calculation speed and module of the feed are the most beneficial, attendees said.

In this case, it is fair to answer a question because it forces a store to consider factors affecting the mold processing environment to check its cutting tool expectations and requirements. These factors include tool geometry, coating, size, brand, surface penetration, cutting depth, cutting width, feed, dry or wet processing, power consumption and rigidity of each tooth. Manipulating these variables can lead to very different results, so a store’s processing cost method is key.

For example, many stores only consider price when selecting cutting tools and tools. This narrow view that often lead to machine efficiency is very poor, this could lead to a lot of hidden costs, including a longer period of time, bad tool life, not accurate shape tolerance and so on. General mold workshops cost between 2 and 4 per cent of their total operating expenses on knives and knives. If a shop wants to find a tool that costs half the cost of its current usage, it can theoretically reduce processing costs to between 1 and 2 percent of operating costs. However, a more expensive tool that can quickly double the parts from the machine will double the store’s potential revenue.